Sentencing in Felony Cases Just Got More Complicated

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional unless considered advisory. A creative, intelligent, savvy defense lawyer now has a significant advantage when advocating for a lenient sentence.

Michigan Sentence Guidelines are Advisory

The Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358, 399; 870 NW2d 502 (2015), seriously changed sentencing in felony cases in Michigan. See Michigan Sentencing Guidelines are now Discretionary. Lockridge can be either good or bad for criminal defendants. Lockridge held that a judge could go under or over the suggested guidelines depending on individual circumstances.

The sentencing guidelines factor in a person’s prior criminal record (PRV) and facts about the specific charge (OV). Each category is given a set of points. These points are inserted into a grid, ultimately determining the sentencing guidelines. If a defendant disputes the sentencing, the defendant can file the necessary pleadings to bring the matter before the court. After Lockridge, supra, the court must still review the guidelines but the court is not bound by them at sentencing on a felony case.

Since the Lockridge case determined that the sentencing court has committed plain error when it calculates an OV score “using facts beyond those found by the jury or admitted by the defendant” if that miscalculation “would change the applicable guidelines minimum sentence range.” In the case of People v Blevins, decided in February 2016, the defendant argued that OV5 (serious psychological injury to the victim’s family may require professional treatment) could be scored 0 or 15. The only evidence of psychological injury was presented at sentencing. The Court of Appeals determined that there was no evidence presented to a jury or admitted by the defendant relative to serious psychological injury, and the error would change the guidelines; therefore, the score must be zero at sentencing on the felony case.

Can a judge sentence the defendant below the sentencing guidelines in a felony case?

Following Lockridge, it is easier for judges to determine when sentencing below the guidelines is appropriate in felony cases. A variance or departure below the guidelines in a felony sentencing requires a reasonable explanation based on objective facts. This proof requirement is a far lower bar than the previous burden called “substantial and compelling reasons.” A persuasive, reputable defense lawyer is essential because judges now have greater discretion and latitude when determining an appropriate sentence. If a lawyer puts up a zealous, credible fight for a lenient sentence, a judge has more room now to vary the sentence than ever before.

Probation Violation Sentencing in a Felony Case

If the judge sentenced the defendant to probation, they were ordered to follow a set of rules called “terms and conditions of probation.” If there is an allegation of violating the rules, it is called a probation violation. If convicted by plea or trial, a defendant faces sentencing again for the original offense and under the original sentencing guidelines. In other words, a defendant faces the same possible sentencing outcome in a felony case, whether they are getting sentenced for the original conviction or a probation violation.

Never Face Sentencing Without LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. By Your Side

When the stakes are high, and your freedom is on the line, facing sentencing in a felony case without the steadfast support of LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. is a risk you can’t afford to take. Our firm stands out for our unwavering commitment to our clients and our proven track record of achieving favorable outcomes, even in the most challenging cases. At LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C., we understand that every sentencing hearing is a pivotal moment that can significantly impact your life and future. Our seasoned attorneys approach each case with a strategic blend of rigorous legal analysis, persuasive advocacy, and a deep understanding of the law and your unique situation’s nuances.

With decades of combined experience in criminal defense, our team has the knowledge, skill, and tenacity to fight for the best possible sentencing outcome in felony cases. We go beyond the surface, delving into the intricacies of your case, highlighting mitigating factors, and presenting a compelling narrative that humanizes you in the eyes of the court. Our goal is not just to defend you, but to advocate for a sentence that reflects the full context of your circumstances, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment wherever possible. By choosing LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C., you’re not just hiring an attorney; you’re securing a dedicated ally who will stand by your side, fight for your rights, and guide you through one of the most challenging times of your life with compassion, dignity, and unparalleled legal expertise. Never face sentencing alone; let our team be your voice and strength in court, ensuring you receive the justice and second chance you deserve.

Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney For Help With Sentencing in Felony Cases

LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. is one of Michigan’s premier criminal defense law firms. Our attorneys keep current on changes in the law and are well-versed in dealing with sentencing issues. The firm’s attorneys have decades of experience practicing only criminal law. The attorneys are well respected by their peers, former clients, and judges. LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. was founded on the principle that everyone deserves a fair trial and has their rights protected and be fought for in court passionately, tenaciously, and fearlessly. The firm takes great pride in its record of success. If you face criminal charges or need help with sentencing in a felony case, please call LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. for a free consultation.

Call us today at (248) 263-6800 for a free consultation or complete an online Request for Assistance Form. We will contact you promptly and find a way to help you.